Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

             had been brought against these (as such these are not taken into consideration in the                 IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

             percentage that is strictly calculated in relation to the N.C.C.D decisions that had been           THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

             upheld following the challenge brought in court, a percentage that is presented in this                   V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

statistical data).

VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

• • The percentage of upholding in court the N.C.C.D decisions, throughout 2025, as lawful DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

             and reasoned, compared to the number of cases on trial was maintained at a relatively                 VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED
             high degree, around 76.3%. In order to accurately reflect the ratio of cases won vs. lost           ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

cases, this percentage is also compared, within the N.C.C.D statistical data, to the number

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

             of proceedings tried from among those whose subject was to challenge the N.C.C.D deci-                COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

sions in court, instead of comparing them to the total number of decisions adopted by the

IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

Council. This is how one may clearly grasp the most objective and rigorous percentage

2025 that should prove the genuine share of N.C.C.D decisions that had been quashed or, as applicable, uphold, as a result of a judicial review actually implemented (cases under

Activity trial on the merits/appeal).

         Statistical data for judicial proceedings
         brought in order to trigger tort liability                                                          report

CONTENTS

         Introductory note:                                                                                                           WEBSITE

         Pursuant to art. 27 of G.O. No. 137/ 2000R, the person who considers himself/herself                                            EMAIL

         discriminated may submit to the court a claim for damages and remedies in order to re-es-                                   ADDRESS

         tablish the situation prior to the discrimination act or to cancel the situation created by the                           FACEBOOK

48   V. Activity of the Legal Directorate