Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

         and due diligence procedure applied to N.C.C.D decisions adopted pursuant to Art. 20 of                   IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

         G.O. no. 137/2000, republished.                                                                         THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

         As a result of the judicial review and due diligence proceedings applied to the decisions of                  V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

         the N.C.C.D during 2025, the courts solved 194 of the total number of pending cases, by             VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL
         confirming the decisions issued by the Council, on the merits of the case and/or                    DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

         during the appeal, thus rejecting 148 complaints lodged against the decisions                             VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED
         of the N.C.C.D, and admitting an additional 46 such actions.                                            ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

         By the end of 2025, 336 cases were still pending settlement on the docket of courts                        VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

         (on the merits of the case/ on appeal).                                                                   COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

         Thus, based on statistical data, the confirmation rate for the “judicial review”                   IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

2025 to which the decisions of the N.C.C.D were subjected during 2025, compared to the number of settled cases (194 cases), despite a slight decrease in the confirmation rate of the decisions through judicial review (directly caused by the acute understaffing, with

Activity the numerical deficit constantly increasing even within the Legal Directorate), remained at a relatively high level – 76.3%. Conclusions regarding the confirmation rate for the “judicial review” to which the decisions of the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board were subjected:

• • The statistical data at issue are related to court judgements regarding all the N.C.C.D

                                                                                                             report
             decisions under challenge, no matter which was the final decision taken, either meaning                                CONTENTS
             that a discrimination had been found and administrative sanctions were taken, or that                                    WEBSITE
             a discrimination had not been found, which is the equivalent with a rejection of the                                        EMAIL
             petition in question.                                                                                                   ADDRESS

• • The N.C.C.D decisions that had not been challenged in court add up to the number of FACEBOOK

N.C.C.D decisions that were rendered final, deemed lawful and reasoned, as no challenge

47   V. Activity of the Legal Directorate