Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

         The activity of settling disputes which represents the subject of the above-mentioned pe-               IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

         titions is achieved within a jurisdictional administrative framework, following a specific            THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

         special procedure which is subordinated to the key features of the special administrative                   V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

         jurisdiction: optional and gratuitous nature of jurisdiction, functional independence of the      VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

         jurisdictional authority, compliance with the principles of ensuring the right to defence and     DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

         safeguarding the adversarial nature of the proceedings.                                                 VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

The legal verifications and due diligence procedure applied to the decisions of the N.C.C.D’s

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

         Steering Board fall under the jurisdiction of administrative proceedings courts (Courts                 COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

of Appeal, operating as first instance courts, respectively the High Court of Cassation

IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

and Justice, as an appellate court), as stipulated by art. 20, para. (9) and (10) of G.O. no.

2025 137/2000, republished, in conjunction with art. 6 of the Law on administrative proceedings no. 554/2004.

         The time-limit within these jurisdictional-administrative documents may be appealed
         against is 15 days since their service, otherwise they become enforceable.                       Activity
         The confirmation rate for the “judicial review”                                                   report
         to which the decisions of the Steering                                                                                   CONTENTS

         Board were subjected during 2025                                                                                           WEBSITE

EMAIL

ADDRESS

         During 2025, the competent courts (the Courts of Appeal and the High Court of Cassation                                 FACEBOOK
         and Justice) had a total of 458 cases on their docket, whose subject was the judicial review

46   V. Activity of the Legal Directorate