Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        The Steering Board considered that the differentiation established by the analysed ad-                   IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

        ministrative act is based exclusively on the criterion of domicile or residence, which, in             THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        this context, results in an unjustified disadvantage for a category of persons in a situation                V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

        comparable to that of property owners domiciled in the locality. In the absence of a pro-          VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

        portional and adequate justification for the pursued purpose, this difference in treatment         DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

        is likely to affect the exercise of the right of access to a public service on equal terms.              VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

Consequently, the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board found the existence of an act of discrimination,

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

        pursuant to Art. 2 para. (1) and Art. 10 letter h) of GO no. 137/2000 on the prevention and              COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

sanctioning of all forms of discrimination, and imposed a warning sanction on the respondent.

IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

4 2025 A person with a locomotor disability lodged a petition with N.C.C.D regarding the

Activity conduct of an air transport operator, alleging refusal to provide boarding assistance for a domestic flight, refusal to fully refund the value of the purchased tickets, and

report imposing the condition to travel accompanied on certain types of aircraft.

        Upon analysing the facts, the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board noted that the aspects invoked by
        the applicant pertain to the application of safety regulations and operational conditions
        specific to air transport, established pursuant to the special legislation in the field. The                              CONTENTS

        Board found that the respondent justified the contested measures by the necessity to                                        WEBSITE

        comply with flight safety requirements and technical limitations of certain types of air-                                      EMAIL

        craft, justifications that are objective in nature and applicable to all passengers in similar                             ADDRESS

        circumstances.                                                                                                           FACEBOOK

40   IV. Examples based on the case-law of findings made by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board