Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        The Board also noted that the applicant’s intention to participate in the competition, in                  IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

        conjunction with the deterrent effect of the condition imposed in the announcement, is rel-              THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        evant in analysing the limitation of access to the recruitment. Consequently, the N.C.C.D’s                    V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

        Steering Board found the existence of an act of indirect discrimination, pursuant to Art.            VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

        2 para. (3) correlated with Art. 8 para. (2) of GO no. 137/2000, and applied a warning               DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

        sanction to the respondent.                                                                                VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

        2       The applicant notified the N.C.C.D, requesting the issuance of an expert opinion re-

COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

                garding the discriminatory nature of their medical classification as “fit for work with     IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

2025 restrictions,” in the context of the selection procedure for occupying a position within an external mission, based on the criterion of a non-contagious chronic oncological disease, surgically treated and declared cured according to the medical documents presented. Activity report In the expert opinion, the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board found that maintaining the classi- fication of “fit for work with restrictions” in the case of the applicant, established solely based on medical history consisting of a non-communicable oncological disease declared cured, without conducting an individual medical assessment in relation to the specific

CONTENTS

job requirements, constitutes differentiated treatment based on health status. The Board

WEBSITE

considered that such a practice is likely to limit equal access to employment and affect

EMAIL

        equal opportunities, within the meaning of the provisions of GO no. 137/2000, and noted,                                     ADDRESS
        in the course of the opinion, the existence of an act of discrimination.                                                   FACEBOOK

38   IV. Examples based on the case-law of findings made by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board