Program de
guvernare
Documentul original ↗
Proiect editorial 2026-2028Propuneri, date și condiții de implementare, cu stadiul verificării la vedere.

Document colectat · Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea

Vezi raport EN

Instituția sau publicația sursă
Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea
Data preluării
26.09.2026 17:54
Dimensiunea materialului
9.870,1 KB

Conținutul documentului colectat

Secțiuni și tabele

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

Equal opportunities in economic activities

IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

and in employment and profession

DIRECTORATE

VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

1

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

An individual notified the N.C.C.D regarding the conditions imposed by the recruitment

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

                announcement for occupying a contractual position within the local police department,            COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

                stating that they could not participate due to the mandatory requirement of “completed    IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

military service,” while mandatory military service had been suspended and its com-

2025 pletion became voluntary.

Activity In this case, the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board analysed the potentially discriminatory nature of the condition in the recruitment announcement, noting that the requirement of fulfilled

report military service constitutes an apparently neutral practice which disadvantages certain categories of individuals in the application process and may affect the exercise of the right to work under equal conditions. The Board found that, for the activity corresponding to the position, this requirement does not constitute a genuine and decisive professional criterion

CONTENTS

within the meaning of Art. 5 of GO no. 137/2000, and that the justification provided by the

WEBSITE

respondent (institutional needs and mobilization obligations) does not demonstrate that

EMAIL

the chosen method is appropriate and necessary, given that there are alternative ways to

ADDRESS

verify professional competencies without creating differentiation.

FACEBOOK

37   IV. Examples based on the case-law of findings made by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board

Valorile și formulările aparțin documentului citat. Data preluării nu reprezintă perioada datelor sau data publicării de către instituție.

Identificarea exactă a documentului colectat

Amprenta SHA-256 permite identificarea versiunii preluate.

0b0c541e794554ba5797911cff540e3ef6fa67d70f4bf5541d32f657f52df570