Document colectat · Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea
Vezi raport EN
- Instituția sau publicația sursă
- Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea
- Data preluării
- 26.09.2026 17:54
- Dimensiunea materialului
- 9.870,1 KB
Conținutul documentului colectat
Secțiuni și tabele
FOREWORD
I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED
WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025
II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025
III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING
BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED
BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD
Equal opportunities in economic activities
IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE
CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY
THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD
V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL
and in employment and profession
DIRECTORATE
VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL
DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE
SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD
VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED
ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED
1
IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS
An individual notified the N.C.C.D regarding the conditions imposed by the recruitment
VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR
announcement for occupying a contractual position within the local police department, COMBATING DISCRIMINATION
IN THE MASS-MEDIA
stating that they could not participate due to the mandatory requirement of “completed IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA
military service,” while mandatory military service had been suspended and its com-
2025 pletion became voluntary.
Activity In this case, the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board analysed the potentially discriminatory nature of the condition in the recruitment announcement, noting that the requirement of fulfilled
report military service constitutes an apparently neutral practice which disadvantages certain categories of individuals in the application process and may affect the exercise of the right to work under equal conditions. The Board found that, for the activity corresponding to the position, this requirement does not constitute a genuine and decisive professional criterion
CONTENTS
within the meaning of Art. 5 of GO no. 137/2000, and that the justification provided by the
WEBSITE
respondent (institutional needs and mobilization obligations) does not demonstrate that
the chosen method is appropriate and necessary, given that there are alternative ways to
ADDRESS
verify professional competencies without creating differentiation.
37 IV. Examples based on the case-law of findings made by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board
Valorile și formulările aparțin documentului citat. Data preluării nu reprezintă perioada datelor sau data publicării de către instituție.
Identificarea exactă a documentului colectat
Amprenta SHA-256 permite identificarea versiunii preluate.
0b0c541e794554ba5797911cff540e3ef6fa67d70f4bf5541d32f657f52df570