Document colectat · Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea
Vezi raport EN
- Instituția sau publicația sursă
- Rapoarte privind nediscriminarea
- Data preluării
- 26.09.2026 17:54
- Dimensiunea materialului
- 10.232,2 KB
Conținutul disponibil în colecție
Textul documentului
IN AREAS
AREAS Pursuant to the provisions of Article 5 of Law No. 448/2006 on the rights of persons
PROTECTED BY LAW with disabilities, the public or private legal person has the obligation to adapt the con-
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE ditions of entry and stay for persons with disabilities, including for persons requiring
INVESTIGATION OFFICE a guide dog.
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board considered that the company did not include within their
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
specific regulation the provisions in place for the situation of disabled customers and
THE ISSUE OF that the staff was not properly trained to deal with customers, including disabled people.
DISCRIMINATION IN
ROMANIA REFLECTED
N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS
to the provisions of Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 10 f) and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination
law and imposed an administrative fine against the commercial company amounting
NATIONAL COUNCIL to 5,000 lei, and an administrative fine of 2,000 lei and an administrative fine of
FOR COMBATING
4,000 lei against the company providing security services for the shop.
DISCRIMINATION
IN MASS-MEDIA
FINANCIAL
AND PERSONNEL
DATA
47
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD
ANALYSIS OF
DECISION D
III. Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D. in 2022 concerning discrimination in areas protected by law
PETITIONS RECEIVED
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022 Imposing restrictions on access to a restaurant for children under the age of 6 and
their accompanying persons on the grounds of preventing the spread of SARS-COV-2
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
and the right to select the clients constitutes an act of discrimination.
ON THE DECISIONS
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S Referring to its own case law (Judgment No. 668 of 15.09.2021 and Judgment No. 809
STEERING BOARD of 17.11.2021), N.C.C.D. has considered that, with regard to restricting access to services
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES FROM THE
offered to the public on the basis of age, without analysing situations in concrete terms,
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.
N.C.C.D. on a case-by-case basis, without establishing a set of specific, objective and justified
IN 2022 CONCERNING criteria, for example by imposing a commitment on customers to ensure appropriate
DISCRIMINATION
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS
AREAS behaviour for their children or by creating special facilities, a situation of unjustified
PROTECTED BY LAW disadvantage is created for customers with underage children.
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE
INVESTIGATION OFFICE N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant
to the provisions of Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 10 f) of the anti-discrimination law and
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
imposed an administrative sanction of issuing a warning against the company and
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
recommended to change the restaurant’s policy to ensure fair access to the services
THE ISSUE OF offered to the public.
DISCRIMINATION IN
ROMANIA REFLECTED
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS DECISION E
NATIONAL COUNCIL Denying access to a store on the ground of refusal to wear a protective mask in cir-
FOR COMBATING
cumstances where not wearing a mask is justified on medical grounds constitutes an
DISCRIMINATION
IN MASS-MEDIA
act of discrimination.
FINANCIAL N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board took into account the fact that the person whose access was
AND PERSONNEL
denied was suffering from allergic bronchial asthma, with a recommendation to be
DATA
48
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD exempted from wearing a protective mask, as the neuropsychic mechanism of the
ANALYSIS OF
asthmatic crisis was known and proved by medical documents. Although these doc-
III. Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D. in 2022 concerning discrimination in areas protected by law
PETITIONS RECEIVED uments were presented to the shop representatives and security staff, they were not
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022 taken into consideration. The refusal based on the legislation on measures ordered in
the context of the Covid-19 pandemic cannot be upheld in the light of the particular
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
medically proven situation.
ON THE DECISIONS
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant
STEERING BOARD to the provisions of Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 10 f) and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES FROM THE
law and imposed an administrative fine against the company amounting to 2,000 lei.
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.
N.C.C.D.
IN 2022 CONCERNING
DISCRIMINATION
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS
PROTECTED BY LAW
AREAS The right to personal dignity
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE
INVESTIGATION OFFICE DECISION A
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
Publication within a period of more than 60 days of press articles which consistently
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
generated offensive or disparaging comments, remarks or phrases, without any cen-
THE ISSUE OF sorship, among which “bloody Machedonian”, “every Machedonian steals” “ greedy
DISCRIMINATION IN specimen “, “Cyban lepers”, “baboon”, “retard face”, “when the Machednians will
ROMANIA REFLECTED
disappear . .. the pollution will decrease”, “filthy, thieving Machedonians”, “chimpan-
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS
zees of Machedonians”, “filthy Machedonians and Gypsies run the city....”, “cretinous
Machedonian”, “race of upstarts”, “allogenic rag”, “good Machedonians are the dead
NATIONAL COUNCIL and buried ones”, “mutant”, “Machedonian scum”, constitute an act of discrimination.
FOR COMBATING
DISCRIMINATION
IN MASS-MEDIA
N.C.C.D. took into account the fact that the impugned statements envisaged the ethnic
origin, political affiliation and physical appearance, constituting multiple discrimination.
FINANCIAL
AND PERSONNEL
DATA
49
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD Although the denigrating nature of the statements was brought to the attention of the
ANALYSIS OF
respondent, no action was taken to remove them, which constituted passive conduct
III. Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D. in 2022 concerning discrimination in areas protected by law
PETITIONS RECEIVED that had the effect of creating a degrading and offensive environment and undermining
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022 human dignity.
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of acts of discrimination pursuant to the
ON THE DECISIONS provisions of Art. 2 para. 1, 4, 6 and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination law and imposed
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S an administrative fine against the media service provider amounting to 10,000 lei.
STEERING BOARD
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES FROM THE
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.
N.C.C.D. DECISION B
IN 2022 CONCERNING
DISCRIMINATION
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS
AREAS Chants by supporters at sporting events, namely “Out, out with the Hungarians from
PROTECTED BY LAW the country”, and “stinking Hungarians” constitute an act of discrimination.
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE
INVESTIGATION OFFICE N.C.C.D. found that those chants represent a conduct aimed at undermining dignity and
creating a hostile, degrading and humiliating atmosphere directed against ethnic Hungarians.
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
Taking into account the case-law on the matter and the provisions of the Regulation
THE ISSUE OF for the organisation of the sporting competition in question, N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board
DISCRIMINATION IN found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Art. 2
ROMANIA REFLECTED
para. 1 and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination law and imposed an administrative fine
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS
against the sports club of amounting to 10,000 lei.
NATIONAL COUNCIL
FOR COMBATING
DISCRIMINATION
DECISION C
IN MASS-MEDIA
The associations created in press articles between certain bacteria or diseases and their
FINANCIAL description in relation to female persons that held positions of elected public dignity
AND PERSONNEL
are not protected by the right to free expression and constitute an act of discrimination.
DATA
50
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD Taking into account the essential role that the press plays in a democratic society,
ANALYSIS OF
including through the presentation of topics of public interest in politics which may
III. Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D. in 2022 concerning discrimination in areas protected by law
PETITIONS RECEIVED include a degree of exaggeration or provocation, N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022 existence of denigrating and humiliating language against women, including offensive
images generated by a local conflict.
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
ON THE DECISIONS Freedom of expression entails responsibilities, including the obligation to avoid ex-
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S pressions which gratuitously offend others, which interfere with their rights and which
STEERING BOARD do not contribute to a form of public debate capable of advancing human relations.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES FROM THE
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.
N.C.C.D. N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant to
IN 2022 CONCERNING the provisions of Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination law and imposed an
DISCRIMINATION
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS
AREAS administrative fine against the online media service provider amounting to 10,000 lei.
PROTECTED BY LAW
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE
INVESTIGATION OFFICE DECISION D
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
The making of a video promoting alcoholic beverages featuring a man and a woman
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
in which an intimate act with sexual connotations is staged and the woman is slapped
THE ISSUE OF on the forehead and labelled a “fool” constitutes an act of discrimination.
DISCRIMINATION IN
ROMANIA REFLECTED
N.C.C.D. found that the message presented in the video promotes prejudice against
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS
women in the society, which are likely to induce negative attitudes towards women
based on unacceptable gestures, going beyond the sphere of freedom of expression.
NATIONAL COUNCIL
FOR COMBATING
N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of the acts of discrimination pursuant to
DISCRIMINATION
IN MASS-MEDIA
the provisions of Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination law and imposed
an administrative fine against the respondent party amounting to 10,000 lei.
FINANCIAL
AND PERSONNEL
DATA
51
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD
ANALYSIS OF
DECISION E
III. Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D. in 2022 concerning discrimination in areas protected by law
PETITIONS RECEIVED
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022 Changing the tag of the People’s Redemption Cathedral within a web application with
global impact that provide detailed geographical location information with the tag
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
“Cathedral of fooling the people” constitutes an act of discrimination by association
ON THE DECISIONS with religious affiliation.
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S
STEERING BOARD N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board noted that the situation created implicitly induced a causal
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLES FROM THE
link between the religious affiliation of certain communities of persons and led to the
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.
N.C.C.D. infringement of the right to human dignity.
IN 2022 CONCERNING
DISCRIMINATION
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS
AREAS N.C.C.D. found that the main entity that provide and manage the web services in
PROTECTED BY LAW question, established in another State, was responsible for the passive attitude in the
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE management of the situation created by the modification of the tag in question, while
INVESTIGATION OFFICE the natural person who made the modification in question was responsible for the
action of modification which produced public effects.
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found the existence of acts of discrimination pursuant to
THE ISSUE OF the provisions of Art. 2 para. 4 and Art. 2 para. 1 and Art. 15 of the anti-discrimination
DISCRIMINATION IN law and imposed an administrative fine against the web service provider amounting
ROMANIA REFLECTED
to 10,000 lei and an administrative fine amounting to 10,000 lei against the indi-
IN INTERNATIONAL
REPORTS
vidual that operated the change.
NATIONAL COUNCIL
FOR COMBATING
DISCRIMINATION
IN MASS-MEDIA
FINANCIAL
AND PERSONNEL
DATA
52
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
IV. Activity of the Case
Investigation Office
53
2022
ACTIVITY
REPORT
CONTENT
FOREWORD In 2022, the Case Investigation Office continued to centralize cases where administra-
ANALYSIS OF
tive fines had been issued and also to follow up on the current phase of proceedings
PETITIONS RECEIVED related to N.C.C.D.’s decisions taken in the above-mentioned cases.
BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022
In such cases where N.C.C.D.’s decisions were not challenged in front of courts having
ANALYSIS OF CASE
PROCESSING BASED
jurisdiction, the Case Investigation Office notified the competent tax authorities, in
ON THE DECISIONS order to enforce the decisions taken by the Steering Board where administrative fines
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S had been issued.
STEERING BOARD
EXAMPLES FROM THE
In 2022, the Case Investigation Office received 38 files from N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D. in order to notify the fines to the competent tax authorities. Also, the Legal Affairs,
IN 2022 CONCERNING Litigation and Contracts Unit sent 12 files to the Investigation and Review Unit/Case
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS Investigation Office for the same purpose, as a result of N.C.C.D.’s decisions being
PROTECTED BY LAW rendered final and enforceable.
ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY OF
OF THE
THE CASE
CASE
INVESTIGATION
INVESTIGATIONOFFICE
OFFICE A total of 42 investigations were conducted (some of the cases requiring several trips).
Out of the 38 cases investigated, 31 were in urban areas and 5 in rural areas. A total
ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY
of 203 persons were interviewed during the investigations conducted in 2022, with
THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE
IV. Activity of the Case Investigation Office
an avera
← Înapoi la începutul extrasului
Extrasul poate avea altă structură decât documentul original. Data preluării nu reprezintă perioada statistică sau data publicării de către instituție.
Identificarea exactă a documentului colectat
Amprenta SHA-256 permite identificarea versiunii preluate.
8e70fe06445e074d6ad1cab44771fba86d2e9693401109b0cdfb6dee754c2f8d