Vezi raport EN

2023

ACTIVITY

REPORT

FOREWORD

ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS

Equality in economic activity and in terms

RECEIVED BY N.C.C.D. IN 2023

ANALYSIS OF CASES PROCESSED

of employment and occupation

BY N.C.C.D. IN 2023

ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY N.C.C.D.’S STEERING BOARD

DECISION A                                                                                                                                        EXAMPLES FROM THE CASE LAW

OF N.C.C.D.’S STEERING

The exclusion of men’s option to apply for a position of cashier in a public institution                                                                     BOARD DECISIONS

was considered by the N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board a gender-based/sex-related exclusion                                                                          ACTIVITY OF THE CASE

INVESTIGATION OFFICE

form, aimed at restricting the rights of equal access to the labour market, as enshrined

ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY

in article 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.                                                                                  THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE

  Pursuant to the provisions of article 2 para. (1) of G.O. no.137/2000, as well as to the                                                             THE ISSUE OF DISCRIMINATION

IN ROMANIA REFLECTED IN

  provisions of art. 7 and art. 9 of Law No. 202 of 19 April 2002 (republished) on equal                                                                    INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

  opportunities and treatment between women and men, the N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board                                                           NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMBATING

DISCRIMINATION IN MASS-MEDIA

found an act of discrimination and sanctioned the public institution with a warning.

FINANCIAL

AND PERSONNEL DATA

DECISION B

A petitioner informed the N.C.C.D. that he had been harassed following his candidature for a position as CEO of the respondent company. In 2021, the N.C.C.D ’s Steering Board issued a warning to sanction the harassment exerted by the president of the respondent company. Subsequently, the company informed the petitioner that his position in the company would be dismantled, and this resulted into an emotional state of mind and a hostile environment for the petitioner, as he had been working in the company for almost 30 years, dealing with the most sensitive legal matters. In this case, the N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board held that the respondent had applied a disparate treatment to the petitioner, in response to the petition that the latter

                                                                                IV Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board decisions                     32