Vezi raport EN

FOREWORD

I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED

WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025

II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025

III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        The Steering Board assessed that the discourse in question does not fall within the limits                 IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

        of freedom of speech, as it does not pursue a legitimate public interest objective and is not            THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD

        formulated in a proportionate manner, but rather reinforces prejudices and discrimi-                           V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE

        natory attitudes based on sex.                                                                       VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL

DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE

        In this context, the Steering Board established the existence of an act of discrimination,             SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD

        constituted by the infringement of the right to personal dignity, pursuant to Art. 15 of                   VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

GO no. 137/2000 on the prevention and sanctioning of all forms of discrimination, and

VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

        imposed an administrative fine of 5,000 lei, in accordance with Art. 26 para. (1) of GO no.                COMBATING DISCRIMINATION

IN THE MASS-MEDIA

137/2000, republished.

IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

6 2025 An employee of a public cultural institution, holding the position of artistic director,

Activity filed a petition with the Council alleging acts of discrimination, moral harassment in the workplace, and victimisation, further stating that, shortly before the premiere, a

report performance in preparation was suspended by the management. The applicant was subjected to hostile attitudes, professional marginalisation, and measures negatively affecting their activity, including within the context of the initiatives and petitions submitted.

CONTENTS

        In this case, the Steering Board found that the reported facts describe a work environment                                    WEBSITE

        in which, through repeated actions and hostile attitudes, a hostile and degrading atmo-                                          EMAIL

        sphere was created for the applicant, likely resulting in the deterioration of working                                       ADDRESS

        conditions by infringing the applicant’s rights and dignity. Furthermore, the Steering                                     FACEBOOK

42   IV. Examples based on the case-law of findings made by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board