Document colectat · Rapoarte publice privind educația
Raport România 2009
- Instituția sau publicația sursă
- Rapoarte publice privind educația
- Data preluării
- 26.09.2026 17:55
- Dimensiunea materialului
- 240,7 KB
Conținutul disponibil în colecție
Textul documentului
9
5. Relationship between higher education and research
a) Please describe the main trends in the role of higher education institutions in
research in your country.
HEIs have always played a central role in the research developed in the country.
After 2005, the following determinant factors have even fortified the role of
universities when comparing with other actors active in academic and/or aplied
research: both public and private investments in HE have registered a significant
increase, with a focus on investment in research infrastructure; the newly
implemented framework for quality assurance in higher education and research,
with direct impact on the funding of universities and on their certification for
accessing European and national research funds has also had a positive impact
on HEIs in terms of research performance (one example: the number of ISI
journals produced in Romanian universities is 43 in 2008 compared to only 9 in
2006); partnerships between HEIs and research institutes have brought together
individual researchers in clusters which strengthen mainly university research
teams; doctoral students recognized as early stage researchers contribute also to
the incresed share of the universities in the total scientific output; since 2005 the
progression in the academic career is strictly correlated to the research
performance of each candidate.
b) Please outline any measures to improve co-operation between higher education
institutions and other private and public institutions that undertake research. Please
include:
• percentage of GDP spent on research
o from public funds
o from private funds
• total annual national research expenditure (expressed in national currency)
o from public funds
o from private funds
• percentage of research carried out in higher education institutions (in terms of
funding)
• details of the funding mechanisms for doctoral students in your country
According to commitments assumed by Romania within the Lisbon Agenda, the
RDI will benefit of at least 1% of the GDP in 2010 from public funds and another
1% will flow from private funds. Estimates for 2007 show a GERD rate of 0.65%
of GDP (as compared to only 0.41% in 2005), which offers a positive perspective
for the fullfilment of the assumed target. Lates available data show that private
financing represent 48.5% of the total RDI expenditure.
10
The research carried out by public and private HEIs represented 32.7% in the
total funding of RDI. To this figure one should add the institutional financing of the
doctoral schools representing 11.5% out of the total research budget of the
universities. Romanian universities offered in 2008 over 3,000 places for doctoral
studies which are fully supported from the state budget. This represent almost the
double of the intake for doctoral studies in the previous academic year.
According to their teaching and research capacity, fully accredited universities
have the freedom to establish a number of study places for doctoral students
which pay tuition fees.
Doctoral students have various opportunities to get study and or research grants
by participating in grant competitions organised by each doctoral school. Grants
for doctoral students are financed from the state budget (excellence grants,
exploratory research grants, advanced research grants). Most of the doctoral
schools offer also excellence grants financed from university incomes originated
in research and consultancy activities. Starting with 2008/2009, doctoral students
compete also for grants funded from European Social Funds.
c) Is there any tracking system to follow the further career of doctoral graduates?
Yes No If Yes, please specify:
The system covers only that part of doctoral graduates which continue their
research in post-doctoral projects or accept to develop a professional career in
the higher education system. As incentives targeting this end, in the National
Plan for RDI for 2007-2013, several funding schemes have been included for
individual post-doc researchers as well as for those interested to get a "first
research grant as team leader".
A more comprehensive tracking system is curently under development as
outcome of a Phare Programme. It aims to cover all the graduates of all the three
cycles in higher education.
6. Access6 and admission to the next cycle
Describe the arrangements for access between the first and second cycles and
between the second and third cycles.
6.1 Access and admission between the first and second cycles
Please indicate:
a) the percentage of first cycle qualifications that give access to the second cycle
100% - All first cycle qualifications give full access to the second cycle.
6
Access as defined in the Lisbon Recognition Convention: “Access: the right of qualified candidates
to apply and be considered for admission to higher education.”
11
b) any first cycle qualifications that do not give access to the second cycle (please
specify)
No.
c) any special requirements for access to a second cycle programme in the same
field of studies: please tick whether graduates must:
sit entrance exam Yes No In some cases
complete additional courses Yes No In some cases
have work experience Yes No In some cases
If the answer to the last point is yes, please specify what type of work
experience is required:
d) any further special requirements for access to a second cycle programme in the
same field of studies
Some second cycle programmes are fully taught in foreign languages (English,
French or German) and the applicant should provide a language competence
certificate or accept an additional examination.
e) to which students the above special requirements apply (please tick):
all students Yes No
holders of particular first cycle qualifications Yes No
students of the same field coming from other HEIs Yes No
f) which of the requirements apply to students coming from other fields of studies
(please tick):
entrance exam Yes No In some cases
additional courses Yes No In some cases
work experience Yes No In some cases
6.2 Access and admission between the second and third cycles
Please indicate:
a) the percentage of second cycle qualifications that give access to the third cycle
100% - All second cycle qualifications give access to the third cycle.
b) any second cycle qualifications that do not give access to the third cycle (please
specify)
No.
c) any measures planned to remove obstacles between cycles
Access depends only on personal academic performance in the previous study
cycle and on results of the sitted entrance examination.
12
7. Employability of graduates/ cooperation with employers
a) What measures are being taken to enhance the employability of graduates with
bachelor qualifications? Please include the most recent statistical data on the
employment status of graduates of all cycles.
If your higher education institutions also provide professional bachelor programmes,
please provide employability data for both types of bachelors separately
Romania does not have at the moment official statistical data on employability of
graduates of all cycles as 2008 is the year for the first cohort graduating the first
cycle. The Bologna type second cycle has just started on 01.10.2008. According
to the data gathered in Romania for the EU Labour Force Survey for 2007, the
group of high educational attainment level of 15 to 24 year olds shows an
employment rate of 63.4% and an activity rate of 80.4%, while the unemployment
rate reaches 21.1%.
The outcomes of a curently developed Phare-Tvet Project refer to the tracking
methodology of graduates of all three study cycles and will be implemented
starting with academic year 2008-2009.
b) To what extent there is a dialogue in your country between higher education
institutions and employers on:
curriculum design, work placements and international experience
Significant Some A little None
accreditation/quality assurance
Significant Some A little None
university governance
Significant Some A little None
c) Are first cycle graduates able to pursue careers in the public service on an equal
footing with other graduates?
Yes No In some cases
d) Have you aligned recruitment procedures and career structures in the public
service to take account of the Bologna changes?
Yes No In some cases
If no, or in some cases only, please explain the current situation:
Graduates of the first Bologna cycle are recruited in the local public services. The
Ministry of Education, Research and Youth in cooperation with the Ministry of
Labour will soon take the needed measures to clarify the changes induced by the
Bologna Process in terms of structuring university studies into three cycles with
clear employability of graduates of each of the cycles.
13
8. Implementation of national qualifications framework
Please answer the questions below. Please add comments which accurately
describe the current situation in your country.
a) Has the national qualifications framework been prepared7?
Yes No
Comment By Government Decision No. 1357/2005 the Agency for Qualifications in
Higher Education and Partnership between Universities and representatives of the
Social and Economic Environment (ACPART) was empowered as national autority
for qualifications in higher education. It has developed during 2007 the methodology
aiming at the development of a National Register for Higher Education Qualifications.
It has also conducted a pilot project meant to confirm applicability and conformity of
the descriptors involved for 17 selected first and second cycle study programmes in
8 different fields of study. After needed adjustments and amendments of the 2007
version, the Methodology is curently under examination in the Ministry of Education,
Research and Youth before being aproved by the Romanian Government. Full
implementation will start in 2009.
b) Does the framework or proposed framework include generic descriptors for each
cycle based on learning outcomes and competences?
Yes No
Comment For each cycle of studies the proposed methodology includes besides the
specific descriptors the generic ones, and the link between the 3 cycles was carefully
considered in diferentiating higher education qualifications.
c) Does it include ECTS credit ranges for the first and second cycle?
Yes No
Comment The qualifications framework specifies ECTS ranges for each cycle: 180
or 240 ECTS for the first cycle and 120 ECTS for the second cycle. In special cases,
the second cycle could have 90 or even 60 ECTS, but the summation of credit points
of the first and second cycle should be at least 300 ECTS.
d) Has the NQF been nationally discussed with all stakeholders?
Yes No
Comment The first version of the framework was in public debate in 2007 and the
improved NQFHE Methodology has been largely discussed in 2008 in regional
7
A national framework of qualifications compatible with the overarching framework of qualifications of
the EHEA
14
meetings and conferences with the main stakeholders (academic staff
representatives, students, graduates, main professional associations, diferent
categories of employers, here including ministries and other bodies of the public
administration) and also with highschools.
If the answer to d) is No, please answer question e):
e) has a timetable been agreed for consultations with all stakeholders?
Yes No
Comment
If the answer to d) is Yes, please answer the following questions:
f) Are all formal arrangementsdecisions for implementing the framework in place and
have the necessary formal decisions for establishing the framework been taken?
Yes No
Comment As mentioned above, the Methodology for NQFHE is curently under
examination in the Ministry of Education, Research and Youth before being aproved
by the Romanian Government. Full implementation will start in the academic year
2008-2009.
15
g) How far has the implementation of the national qualifications framework
progressed (please tick one)
- The framework is fully implemented. All qualifications have been
added to the NQF through a QA procedure (e.g. accreditation)
- There is significant progress on implementing the framework
- The work of describing all qualifications in terms of learning outcomes
and competencies has been completed
- There is a timetable for implementation and the work has started
- Work on implementing the framework has not yet started but a
timetable for implementation has been agreed
- Work on implementing the framework has not yet started and there is
no timetable for implementation
Comment The good practice acquired during the pilot phase of implementation and
the wide debate on methodology and procedures to be followed by universities offer
to the national autority for higher education the perspective to complete the work for
the three cycle graduates up to the end of 2010.
h) What is the stage of progress on the self-certification of compatibility with the
EHEA framework ?
Completed Started, but not yet completed Not yet started
Comment The Methodology contains provisions refering to the self-certification of
compatibility of the Romanian NQFHE with the EQF of the EHEA.
i) Has the self-certification report been published?
Yes No
Comment
Please add any additional comments if necessary:
Comment
16
NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE EHEA (ESG)8
9. Reviewing the QA system against the ESG9 and national support for
implementation
a) Has your national QA system been reviewed against the ESG?
Yes No Not yet, but such a review is planned
(Please specify time)
b) If a review has been undertaken or is planned, please give further details of the
review process.
The European University Association (EUA) was invited to conduct an audit of
ARACIS (Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education). This
took place during the academic year 2007-2008, based on a self evaluation
exercise conducted in the last trimester of 2007 and an independent evaluation of
the Agency developed by an independent group of Romanian academic experts
in university management.
Citation from the executive summary of the EUA Audit: "ARACIS is contributing
substantially to improving the overall quality of higher education in Romania, and
should continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Furthermore, having
examined this evidence in conjunction with each of the ESG standards in Part 3,
it is the external panel's considered opinion that ARACIS is substantially
compliant with ESG. It is recommended that ARACIS should be admited as a full
member to the European Quality Assurance Register."
The European Student Union (ESU) has been also invited to conduct its own
external evaluation. This took place in August and September 2008 with
comparable outcomes to those of the EUA audit.
c) If a review process has been undertaken, did it result in any of the following:
Stakeholder consultation on changes required to the national QA system?
Yes No
The introduction of specific financial or other incentives aimed at improving the
internal quality assurance processes in institutions?
Yes No
If Yes, please give details of these incentives: Romania has improved the impact
of quality related factors influencing the per capita financing of the number of
equivalent students from 20% in 2006/2007 to 30% in 2008/2009 as an incentive
aimed at improving the internal quality assurance processes in HEIs.
• Other measures
Yes No
8
http://www
← Înapoi la începutul extrasului
Extrasul poate avea altă structură decât documentul original. Data preluării nu reprezintă perioada statistică sau data publicării de către instituție.
Identificarea exactă a documentului colectat
Amprenta SHA-256 permite identificarea versiunii preluate.
7fd8b0be1342771384ebcf1e0ea63e7d5e4091d2e1a723571c4277e2a63e1eb0