Vezi raport EN

„protecţie efectivă a drepturilor omului” the differentiated treatment was related to the religious affiliation (direct discrimination), contrary to the provisions of art. 2 par. 1 and par. 4 of G.O. no. 137.2000, republished).

(2007) Employment relationships. Salary entitlements. Political convictions. Mr. S.V. complained about the fact that he was subjected to a discriminatory treatment because of his political convictions. Following the fact that the petitioner publicly criticized the gesture of the respondent of changing his political views and of transferring to another political party, his salary entitlements were affected in relation to those of other employees ( a smaller amount of wage rewards, reduction of management compensation, failure to grant merit salary and pay overtime). Through decision no. 400 of 07.11.2007, the Committee set down that the petitioner’s professional evaluations were maximum and in relation to his activity there was a differentiated situation between him and other employees in similar positions, with regard to salary entitlements. The Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are indirect discrimination, according to art. 1 par. 2, lett. i, art. 2 par. 2 and par. 3, art. 6 par. 1 lett. c and art. 15 of G.O. no. 137/2000. The respondent was sanctioned by contraventional fine amounting to 400 RON (art. 1 par. 2 lett. i, art.

44 CONSILIUL NAŢIONAL PENTRU COMBATEREA DISCRIMINĂRII

2 and par. 3, art. 6 par. 1 lett. c and art. 15 of G.O. no. 137/2000, republished).

(2008) Employment relationships. Disciplinary inquiry. Termination of labour agreement. Political convictions. Mr. C.V.I. former member of a political party and supporter was appointed in a management position. He complained about the fact that the employer asked him to withdraw from the position he held on ground of implementing a political order. Other persons, who held similar positions and were part of the party which the petitioner joined were requested to do the same. The petitioner was subjected to disciplinary inquiries and ultimately his labour contract was terminated. The respondent stated that the disciplinary inquiries were based on irregularities found in the fulfillment of work prerogatives, which led to the termination. Through decision no. 260 of 18.02.2008, the Committee found that the treatment to which the petitioner was subjected (telephone calls, requesting resignation, checks, disciplinary inquiries, termination of contract) constitute harassment at work, justified by his political convictions. It was found that the notified deeds are discrimination according

to art. 2 par. 1 and art. 2 par. 5 of G.O. no. 137/2000. The respondent was sanctioned by warning (art. 2 par. 1 and art. 2 par. 5 of G.O. no. 137/2000, republished).

(2008) Employment relationships. Disciplinary inquiry. Termination of labour agreement. Political convictions. Mr. D.D. complained about the fact that the employer objected that he is not in the right party and he was afterwards subjected to disciplinary inquiries, being charged with serious disciplinary offences and injuries to the company. Afterwards, he received by fax the decision of termination of the labour agreement. Through decision no. 401 of 22.07.2008, the Committee noted that the start of control and disciplinary procedure actions, although based on presumptive offences, was related to the fact that the petitioner was not a member of a certain political party. The Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are direct discrimination according to art. 2 par. 1 and par. 4 of G.O. no. 137/2000. The respondent was contraventionally sanctioned by warning. (art. 2 par. 1 and par. 4 of G.O. no. 137/2000, republished).

(2008) Employment relationships. Disciplinary inquiry. Termination of labour agreement. Political convictions. Mr. G.G. complained about the fact that the employer asked him to relinquish the position he held, on grounds of implementing a political order, namely the fact that he had no political support anymore (he was not anymore part of a certain party). The petitioner was subjected to a disciplinary inquiry and was sanctioned by warning and during the time when he had been in medical leave, another person, member of a political party was appointed in his place. Through decision no. 546 of 06.10.2008, the Committee set down that the employer decided to initiate certain control and disciplinary