Vezi raport EN

ied ads. Employment condition. NCCD was self-notified regarding the ads-job offers published in the newspaper „Adevărul” (during 1 – 23 June 2003) related to restraining the participation in a competition on certain criteria (age, gender, affiliation with an ethnic group or a minority, etc). Through decision no. 192/10.06.2003, it set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 2, art. 7 par. 2 of G.O. no. 137/2000). RO - Piaţa Valter Mărăcineanu 1-3, sector 1, Bucureşti, Tel / fax 021-312.65.78/79/85 33 „building trust in human rights” www.cncd.org.ro  „protecţie efectivă a drepturilor omului” 106. Classified ads. Employment condition. NCCD was self-notified regarding the ads-job offers published in the newspaper „Ziarul” (during 1 – 23 June 2003) related to restraining the participation in a competition on certain criteria (age, gender, affiliation with an ethnic group or a minority, etc). Through decision no. 193/10.06.2003, it set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 2, art. 7 par. 2 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 107. Classified ads. Employment condition. NCCD was self-notified regarding the ads – job offers published in the daily newspaper „Ziua” (during 1 – 23 June 2003) related to restraining the participation in a competition on certain criteria (age, gender, affiliation with an ethnic group or a minority, etc). Through decision no. 194/10.06.2003 it set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 2, art. 7 par. 2 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 108. Classified ads. Ethnical origin. Roma. Romani Criss notified the publishing in the newspaper " Piaţa de la A la Z”, section Rent of a real estate ad with the following content: "2 chambers in villa, separate entry, basin and water in the room, without bathroom, WC in the yard, Roma excluded (..)". Through decision no. 208/01.07.2003, the Committee set down that the ad has a discriminatory character and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning”. (art. 2 par. 2, art. 10 lett. c of G.O. no. 137/2000). 109. Press article. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. Romani Criss notified the publication of a press article for the newspaper „24 Ore mureşene” regarding the situation and behaviour of Roma origin persons, which comprised stereotyped characterizations „bandits, crooks, thieves, bribe givers, crows, aggressiveness, injurious croaking" etc. Through decision no. 215/14.07.2003, the Committee set down that the article has a discriminatory character and that is offends the dignity of persons belonging to the Roma community. It decided to sanction the defendant by contraventional fine amounting to 2.000.000 lei (art. 2 par. 2, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 110. Education. Segregation. Separate classes. Ethnic origin. Roma. Romani Criss notified the placing of Roma origin children in separate classes in a separate annex of the main building of the school in Cehei, with different study conditions for the Roma children compared to non-Roma ones. Through decision no. 218/23.06.2003, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 2 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 111. Classified ads. Ethnic origin. Roma. NCCD and Romani Criss notified the publishing of a real estate ad in the newspaper„Monitorul de Vrancea”, with the following content: „I sell a house (...) 283 sq m (..) We do not sell to Roma”. Through decision no. 262/25.08.2003, the Committee set down that the ad has a discriminatory character and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 2, art. 10 lett. c of G.O. no. 137/2000). 112. Access to goods and services. Prohibition. Ethnic origin. Roma. NCCD was self-notified regarding the banning of access of a group of persons of Roma ethnic origin inside the club Guinness Pub and Green Club. Through decision no. 287/28.08.2003, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 10 lett. f of G.O. no. 137/2000). IX. Ascertaining solutions issued in 2004 113. Press article. Ethnic origin. Personal dignity. R.D. complained about a press article written by C.M. referring to the situation and behaviour of Romanian citizens of Roma origin which contained stereotyped characterizations like „grimy”, „loyal customers of police (..) and of dermatologists”, „terrorize (…) the area with thefts and scandals” etc. Through decision no. 31/17.02.2004 the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and they offend dignity of persons belonging to the Roma community. Also, it was decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 3 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 114. Statements. National origin. Personal dignity. P.A. complained about the statements of K.G. published in the local RO - Piaţa Valter Mărăcineanu 1-3, sector 1, Bucureşti, Tel / fax 021-312.65.78/79/85 34 „building trust in human rights” www.cncd.org.ro  „protecţie efectivă a drepturilor omului” press regarding the fact that he is against the appointment of a Romanian director in high-school: ”I am against the only member of Romanian nationality becoming director”. Through decision no. 145/19.05.2004, the Committee set down that the statements have a discriminatory character and they offend the petitioner's dignity and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 3, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 115. Press article. Statements. National origin. Hungarians. Personal dignity. Pro Europa League complained against B.A. regarding the article that concerned the situation of the Hungarian community and the generation and of a hostile and adverse environment on grounds of national affiliation. Through decision no. 146/21.05.2004, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and they offend the dignity of the Hungarian community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 3, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 116. Press article. Statements. National origin. Jews. Personal dignity. R.F. complained against N.M.F regarding a press article referring to the national origin of the petitioner and the stating of stereotypes like „Jews don't like to work, F.B. is Jew, didn't you know?". Through decision no. 148/21.05.2004 the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and they offend the dignity of the Jew community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 3, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 117. Political declarations. Statements. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. The Party of Social Democrat Roma complained against D.B.A. regarding his statements taken by the local press referring to the community of Roma, in the case "honourable occupations of the crows (such as prostitution, protection tax)". Through decision no. 167/31.05/2004, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are discrimination and they offend the dignity of the Roma community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 3. art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 118. Press article. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. Romani CRISS complained against M.T. regarding a press article he wrote referring to persons belonging to the Roma community and its specific music. Through decision no. 169/07.05.2004, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and they offend the dignity of persons belonging to the Roma community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 1, par. 3 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 119. Public statements. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. NCCD was self-notified regarding the statement of I.B. taken by the sports' press referring to the ethnic origin of a person. Through decision no. 191/13.07.2004, the Committee ascertained that the statement has a discriminatory character and it offends the dignity of persons belonging to the Roma community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 3 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 120. Employment conditions. Imposing the residence and the knowledge of Hungarian language. National affiliation. The Prefecture of Covasna notified the restraining of filling the position of caretaker, maintenance worker within the City Hall Sfantu Gheorghe by the permanent residence in Sf. Gheorghe and the knowledge of Hungarian language. Through decision no. 281/21.09.2004, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are indirect discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 7 par. 2 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 121. Statements. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. B.F. complained about the statements of B.G., insults referring directly to the Roma ethnic group. Through decision no. 373/02.09.2004, the Committee set down that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and they offend the Roma community and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 1 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). X. Ascertaining solutions issued in 2005 122. Press article. Statements. National origin. Lipovan Russians and Lipovan Ukrainians. Personal dignity. The community of Lipovan Russians of Romania complains about the publishing of an article which contains defamatory RO - Piaţa Valter Mărăcineanu 1-3, sector 1, Bucureşti, Tel / fax 021-312.65.78/79/85 35 „building trust in human rights” www.cncd.org.ro  „protecţie efectivă a drepturilor omului” statements which concern two ethnic minorities: Lipovan Russians and Lipovan Ukrainians. The Committee set down that the article promotes an adverse image for the two ethnic groups mostly living in The Delta of Danube, because the author eliminates references to the building of the Bistroe Channel, a controversial and disputed matter, both domestically and internationally. The author of the article creates a hostile, degrading, humiliating and offensive environment against the two minorities, referring to the dishonest attitude of their members, considering it to be a specific feature of the two nations from which those persons originate. The two ethnic minorities are accused of having allowed and encouraged during and after the second world war the access of „Bolshevik spies” on the Romanian territory. Through decision no. 1 of 06.01.2005 the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided the sanctioning by fine amounting to 1000 RON (art. 2 par. 1 and par. 2, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000, with approvals and amendments). 123. Access to goods and services. Prohibition. Instruction to discriminate. Ethnic origin. Association with Roma. M.C., of Turkish ethnic origin notifies the fact that together with a delegation made up of 10 persons he went to the Terrace S.C. N S.R.L. where their serving was refused „on reason that they are Gypsies”. The defendant denied the facts charged, specified that he did not receive instructions from the owner to apply a differentiated treatment to certain persons and the conflict was due to the fact that persons who accompanied M.C. were warned that they were too noisy. Through decision no. 21 of 09.02.2005, the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and it decided the sanctioning by warning. (art. 2 par. 1. art. 10 lett. f of G.O. no. 137/2000). 124. Access to goods and services. Prohibition. Ethnic origin. Roma. Romani Criss and Press Monitoring Agency, Academia Caţavencu notify the fact that a group made up of young Roma wanted to enter into the club "Bamboo" with the purpose of celebrating an event related to concluding a course. The young Roma were refused on ground that they don't have appropriate dressing and that the club is private and it reserves the right to choose its customers and Roma are not allowed. However, the members of the groups of persons with a pale skin had no difficulties to enter. Through decision no. 26 of 11.01.2005, the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by warning. (art. 2 par. 3 and art. 18 of G.O. 137/2000). 125. Access to goods and services. Real estate ads. Ethnic origin. Roma. Romani CRISS complained about the publishing in the newspaper „Anunţul telefonic” at the section „Various houses rent offers”, position 86, page 62 of 28 February 2005 of a rent ad which forbade persons of Roma origin from renting the house. Through decision no. 37 of 07.03.2005, the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided to sanction the defendant by fine amounting to 700 lei (art. 2 par. 3 and art. 10 lett. c of G.O. no. 137/2000). 126. Statements. National origin. Jews. Personal dignity. Pro Europa League complained about the statements of the defendant comprised in the public speech and taken by the local press, among others: "In Hungary live 10 million people, but their number indicates something else. I must say (...) Hungary is the only country where (...) look please, Germany is led by Germans, Poland is led by Polish, Slovakia by Slovaks, Hungary is the only country that step by step becomes a second Israel". Through decision no. 38 of 09.03.2005 the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are discrimination and it decided sanctioning by fine amounting to 500 lei (art. 2 par. 3 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). 127. Statements. Chanting. Sports manifestations. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. The Steering Committee of NCCD was self-notified regarding the chanting during the football match F.C. Steaua Bucureşti - UFC Rapid Bucureşti. The Agency of Community Development „Impreuna” complained also about the attitude of Mr. G.S. to the coach of the team UFC Rapid Bucuresti, Mr. R.L. The football gallery of FC Steaua Bucuresti chanted among others: „death to gypsies, d...to gypsies, we always had and will always hate them, when Antonescu was alive he was killing them, we p...on them to infinity, ...to Rapid, one more crow has died" (slogan used when a player of Rapid team was fouled). The Committee ascertained that the statements of the gallery of supporters of the Steaua club generated a hostile, degrading, humiliating and offensive environment against the supporters of the opposite team, by frequently using with a negative meaning the term „gypsies” associated to slogans like „death..”, „Antonescu was alive and he killed the gypsies” which resulted in offending the dignity of persons belonging to the Roma minority. The same effect was ascertained in the case of statements of Mr. G.S. to the coach of the team Rapid, Mr. R.L. „gypsy bastard”. Through decision no. 63 of 19.04.2005, the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and it decided to sanction the Club Steaua Bucuresti by fine amounting to 4000 lei and Mr. G.S. with 2000 lei. Also, it was decided to issue a recommendation (art. 2 par. 1 and par. 3 and art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000). RO - Piaţa Valter Mărăcineanu 1-3, sector 1, Bucureşti, Tel / fax 021-312.65.78/79/85 36 „building trust in human rights” www.cncd.org.ro  „protecţie efectivă a drepturilor omului” 128. Statements. Racial origin. Colour. Personal dignity. The Steering Committee of NCCD was self-notified as regards the statements of Mr. A.S. regarding the football players of African origin being part of the football team Universitatea Craiova. Mr. A.S., in an interview broadcasted within the news program of Realitatea TV station stated: : with the players on the internet and on all these crows, if I bring them to the zoo and show them to the children...look, the monkey! there is no distinction (...)". The Committee set down that the statements of the defendant promote an unfavourable image for the African players being part of the football team Universitatea Craiova and they generate a hostile, degrading, humiliating and offending environment against them. Through decision no. 73 of 26.04.2005, the Committee ascertained that the notified deeds are direct discrimination and it decided the sanctioning by fine amounting to 1000 lei (art. 2 par. 1 and 3, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000, subsequently amended and supplemented). 129. Statements. Ethnic origin. Roma. Personal dignity. The Press Monitoring Agency Academia Caţavencu complained about the statements made by G.P. and E.N. during the broadcast „Checkmate” referring to persons of Roma origin who injure the image of Romania through their behaviour outside the borders. Thus, these states that „the members of the Roma ethnic group are more coloured ambassadors who embarrassed us in Europe or people outside the law”. The defendants underlined the fact that „crime is „n” times higher among this ethnic group” or that „instead of being compared with a Latin nation (..), we are being compared with a nation originating from across India (…)”. Through decision no. 75/19.04.2005, the Committee ascertained that the presented deeds are direct discrimination and they offend the dignity of persons belonging to the Roma ethnic minority. Also, it decided to sanction the defendant by warning (art. 2 par. 1 and 3, art. 19 of G.O. no. 137/2000).