Vezi raport EN

shouted to A.P. calling her “monkey” and imitated monkey sounds. Officials of the Romanian Handball Federation attending the game and the game referees did not take any measure in order to stop such racist manifestations, as the sports regulations required. Thus, by the passive behaviour of the FRH game observer and referees, the Steering board considers it is a case of non-criminal offences pursuant to the provisions of Government Ordinance no. 137/2000, as republished.

The Steering board Resolution no. 182/02.03.2016 notes that the aspects observed represent facts of discrimination pursuant to the provisions of Art. 2 par. 1 corroborated to Art. 15 of the Government Ordinance no. 137/2000 on the prevention and punishment of all facts of discrimination, republished, and imposed a contraventional fine of Lei 5000 on the defendant

• - the Handbal Club of Zalău, by its legal representative; Lei 5000 on the defendant - F.R.H.,

by its legal representative; Lei 3000 on the FRH game observer, Mr B.A.; and Lei 2000 on the game referees, Mr. R.H. and Mr. S.S., pursuant to Art. 26 par. 1 of the GO no. 137/2000 on the prevention and punishment of all facts of discrimination, as republished.

24. Discrimination at work, harassment and victimization The complainant claims acts of discrimination, harassment and victimization at work. The criteria indicated by the complainant are: her family situation, her maternity status and her status as a person protected by special legal provisions, that is the provisions of the Govern- ment Ordinance no. 111/2010, as well as her situation as a complainant in a case of violation of equal tratment and non-discrimination rights.

The Steering board also noted that the petitioner notified the NCCD by petition no. 1897/12.03.2015, upon which the decision no. 349/12.08.2016 noted the existence of facts of discrimination. After the decision was enforced, the discriminating treatment continued, and the petitioner was still located in the same meeting room, on the ground floor of the building. Despite the petitioner’s requests, no job task was assigned to her and no office equipment was provided. The petition- er’s treatment eventually led to the termination of her labour contract as of December 8, 2015.

The Steering board Resolution no. 570/14.09.2015 ruled on the notified aspects of differenti- ating and discriminatory treatment, pursuant to the provisions of Art. 2 par. 1, Article 2 par. 7, Article 7 letter a) and Article 15 of the GO 137/2000 on the prevention and punishment of all facts of discrimination, as republished. The defendant was imposed a contraventional fine of RON 15,000 for the facts specified in Article 2, par. 1, Article 2, par. 7, Article 7 let- ter a) and Art. 15 of the GO 137/2000, as republished, pursuant to Art. 26 par. 1 of the GO 137/2000 on the prevention and punishment of all facts of discrimination, as republished. The defendant was also instructed to publish a summary of the NCCD Solution pursuant to the provisions of Art. 26 (2) of the GO 137/2000 on the prevention and punishment of all facts of discrimination, as republished.

25. Disability. Access to public premises The petitioner, a person who cannot move on their own, reports the lack of toilets for disabled, of ways and means of access or ramps, the lack of parking spaces in public institutions and Hotel Muntenia in Pitești, as representing facts of discrimination. In 2012, the petitioner and

58                                                                               N.C.C.D. | Activity Report | 2016