Vezi raport EN

III Examples based on case-law of findings made by N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board

2021 | ACTIVITY REPORT

                         competence criteria following a competition, with-            N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found that acts of discrimi-
                         out any determining and genuine reasons, brings               nation were committed pursuant to Art. 2 para. 1 and
                         about the assumption of a differentiated treatment            Art. 7 a) of the Anti-discrimination Law and ordered
                         based on the criteria of non-political affiliation and        an administrative sanction against the employer by
                         represents an act of discrimination.                          applying a fine amounting to 5,000 lei.

                         Access to public administrative and legal services,
                         to health services, to other services, goods and
                         facilities
                          Decision No. 342 of 07 April 2021                            represent the only determining criterion for assess-
                                                                                       ing and contracting, respectively not contracting, a
                         The bank’s refusal to grant a credit card based on            loan-related product.
                         the reasons that the applicant is over 64 years old,
                         even if the applicant complied with the financial             The bank had been previously sanctioned for having
                         requirements related to the income level, represents          committed an act of discrimination based on the age
                         an act of discrimination. Even if the aim of the bank         criterion, as found by the decision no. 391/06.05.2020.
                         would be to eliminate the risk of loan default that           N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board found that acts of discrim-
                         would result from the fact that, once the retirement          ination were committed pursuant to Art. 2 para. 1         35

                         age is reached, the income decreases, age may not             and Art. 10 h) of the Anti-discrimination Law and