Vezi raport EN

2022

ACTIVITY

REPORT

CONTENT

FOREWORD                  had been initiated (these are not part of the percentage calculated strictly related to

ANALYSIS OF

                          the N.C.C.D.’s decisions that had been uphold following the challenge in
PETITIONS RECEIVED        court, the percentage that is presented in the current statistical data).

BY N.C.C.D. IN 2022

The percentage of upholding in court the N.C.C.D.’s decisions , throughout

ANALYSIS OF CASE

PROCESSING BASED

                          2022, as lawful and reasoned, compared to the cases on trial, although register-
ON THE DECISIONS          ing a slight decrease in the percentage of confirmation by judicial review of the decisions
ISSUED BY N.C.C.D.’S      of N.C.C.D. (a decrease influenced by objective factors, starting with the change in the
STEERING BOARD            composition of the Steering Board during the statistical reference period, a circumstance

EXAMPLES FROM THE

                          which per se requires a reasonable period of sui-generis professional adaptation), was
CASE LAW OF N.C.C.D.      recorded/maintained at a relatively high level, approximately 75%. We reiterate
IN 2022 CONCERNING        that, in order to accurately reflect the share of won cases vs. lost cases, this percentage is
DISCRIMINATION IN AREAS   also compared, within N.C.C.D. statistical data, to the number of proceedings tried from
PROTECTED BY LAW          among those whose subject was to challenge the N.C.C.D.’s decisions in court, instead
ACTIVITY OF THE CASE      of comparing them to the total number of decisions adopted by the Council. This is how
INVESTIGATION OFFICE      one may clearly grasp the most objective and rigorous percentage that should prove the
                          genuine share of N.C.C.D.’s decisions that had been quashed or, as applicable, uphold, as

V. Activity undertaken by the Legal Directorate

ACTIVITY

ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN

UNDERTAKENBY

BY

a result of a judicial review actually implemented (cases under trial on the merits/appeal).

THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE

DIRECTORATE

THE ISSUE OF

DISCRIMINATION IN         STATISTICAL DATA FOR JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT IN

ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL          ORDER TO TRIGGER TORT LIABILITY

REPORTS

NATIONAL COUNCIL          Introductory note:

FOR COMBATING

DISCRIMINATION

IN MASS-MEDIA

                          Pursuant to art. 27 of G.O. No. 137/2000R, the person who considers himself/herself
                          discriminated may submit to the court a claim for damages and remedies in order
FINANCIAL                 to re-establish the situation prior to the discrimination act or to cancel the situation

AND PERSONNEL

DATA

67