Vezi raport EN

2023

ACTIVITY

REPORT

FOREWORD

ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS

DECISION B                                                                                                                                               RECEIVED BY N.C.C.D. IN 2023

ANALYSIS OF CASES PROCESSED

A severely disabled individual with a personal assistant applied for a free parking space                                                                      BY N.C.C.D. IN 2023

pursuant the provisions of Law No. 448/2006 on the protection and promotion of the                                                                ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

rights of persons with disabilities. The local public authority could not offer her the                                                            BY N.C.C.D.’S STEERING BOARD

parking space, to which the petitioner was entitled, as it failed to reserve 4% of the                                                             EXAMPLES FROM THE CASE LAW

total number of parking spaces for persons with disabilities.                                                                                             OF N.C.C.D.’S STEERING

BOARD DECISIONS

  The N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board imposed against the local public authority an admin-                                                                           ACTIVITY OF THE CASE

INVESTIGATION OFFICE

istrative fine of 2,000 RON pursuant to the provisions of art. 65, para. (1) of Law no.

ACTIVITY UNDERTAKEN BY

  448/2006, in conjunction with art. 20. para. 2) of G.O. 137/2000.                                                                                         THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE

THE ISSUE OF DISCRIMINATION

DECISION C                                                                                                                                                 IN ROMANIA REFLECTED IN

INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

A 74-year-old petitioner filed a request to a commercial bank for an extension of the                                                         NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COMBATING

DISCRIMINATION IN MASS-MEDIA

SRC (self-regulated overdraft) contract. After assessing the petitioner’s creditworthiness,

FINANCIAL

the bank refused to renew the credit limit granted on the grounds that the petitioner                                                                         AND PERSONNEL DATA

did not meet the age limit condition. Following the bank’s express refusal based on the age criterion, the Steering Board found that the act referred to it meets the substantial elements of an act of discrim- ination and represents and administrative offence under the provisions of article 2 para. (1) in conjunction with art. 10 letter d) of G.O. no. 137/2000, republished, therefore imposing an administrative fine of 5,000 RON against the respondent.

                                                                                 IV Examples from the case law of N.C.C.D.’s Steering Board decisions                     35