Vezi raport EN

2024

ACTIVITY

REPORT

FOREWORD

ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS

The activity of settling disputes which represents the subject of the above-mentioned pe-

REGISTERED WITH N.C.C.D. IN 2024

                                     titions is achieved within a jurisdictional administrative framework, following a specific
ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D. FILES IN 2024   special procedure which is subordinated to the key features of the special administrative
 ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING         jurisdiction: optional and gratuitous nature of jurisdiction, functional independence of the

BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED

BY THE N.C.C.D.‘ STEERING BOARD      jurisdictional authority, compliance with the principles of ensuring the right to defence and
          EXAMPLES BASED ON          safeguarding the adversarial nature of the proceedings.

CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY

THE N.C.C.D.’ STEERING BOARD

                                     The legal verifications and due diligence procedure applied to the decisions of the N.C.C.D.’
          ACTIVITY OF                Steering Board fall under the jurisdiction of administrative proceedings courts (Courts of
            THE LEGAL                Appeal, operating as first instance courts, respectively the High Court of Cassation and Jus-
         DIRECTORATE                 tice, as an appellate court), as stipulated by art. 20, para. (9) and (10) of O.G. no. 137/2000,
       DISCRIMINATION-RELATED        republished, in conjunction with art. 6 of the Law on administrative proceedings no. 554/2004.

ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED

IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS

The time-limit within these jurisdictional-administrative documents may be appealed against

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR

     COMBATING DISCRIMINATION        is 15 days since their service, otherwise they become enforceable.

IN MASS-MEDIA

FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA

■ THE CONFIRMATION RATE FOR THE “JUDICIAL REVIEW”

THAT N.C.C.D. DECISIONS WERE SUBJECTED TO DURING 2024

During 2024, the competent courts (the Courts of Appeal and High Court of Cassation and Justice) had a total number of 570 cases on their docket, whose subject was the judicial re- view and due diligence procedure applied to C.N.C.D decisions adopted pursuant to art. 20 of G.O. No. 137/2000, republished.

                                               TABLE OF CONTENTS      CONTACT:    WEBSITE      EMAIL       ADDRESS      FACEBOOK        41