Vezi raport EN

1 1 1 4 7 1 3 1 16 IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE No causality relation 1 2 1 11 1 6 11 CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD No infringement of a right 1 2 4 5 4 3 V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL Situations not comparable 1 3 2 2 DIRECTORATE Freedom of speech 1 3 1 3 14 1 2 2 1 1 VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE Justified measure 1 1 1 1 4 1 7 3 SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD No facts found 1 1 4 3 1 5 1 8 VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED Not a different treatment 2 IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS Method for 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR processing COMBATING DISCRIMINATION Non-contagious chronic disease Sexual orientation HIV infection Language Personal beliefs Religion Disadvantaged group Age IN THE MASS-MEDIA those decisions Gender Nationality Disability Ethnicity Other Race Social category issued in 2025 IX. FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL DATA 2025 where no act of No causality No infringement Situations not Freedom Justified No facts Not a different discrimination CRITERIA No criterion No evidence relation of a right comparable of speech measure found treatment TOTAL had been found, Non-contagious chronic disease 1 1 in accordance Sexual orientation 1 1 1 3 Activity with each HIV infection 1 1 discrimination Language 1 1 1 3 report criterion Personal beliefs 1 3 1 1 6 Religion 1 1 Disadvantaged group 0 Age 1 2 2 1 6 Gender 3 1 3 7 CONTENTS Nationality 4 4 1 14 4 27 WEBSITE Disability 2 7 11 5 1 4 3 33 Ethnicity 1 1 3 2 1 1 9 EMAIL Other 16 3 6 4 2 2 7 5 2 47 ADDRESS Race 1 1 1 3 FACEBOOK Social category 37 16 11 3 2 1 3 8 81 TOTAL 59 35 33 19 8 29 19 24 2 228 24 III. Analysis of case processing based on the decisions issued by the N.C.C.D’s Steering Board  FOREWORD I. ANALYSIS OF PETITIONS REGISTERED WITH THE N.C.C.D IN 2025 II. ANALYSIS OF N.C.C.D FILES IN 2025 No criterion 49 1 7 2 III. ANALYSIS OF CASE PROCESSING BASED ON THE DECISIONS ISSUED No evidence 20 4 2 1 1 7 BY THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD No causality relation 23 2 2 1 2 3 IV. EXAMPLES BASED ON THE CASE-LAW OF FINDINGS MADE BY No infringement of a right 6 1 2 10 THE N.C.C.D’S STEERING BOARD Situations not comparable 3 3 2 V. ACTIVITY OF THE LEGAL Freedom of speech 1 3 25 DIRECTORATE Justified measure 7 2 10 VI. INTERNSHIPS WITHIN THE LEGAL DIRECTORATE AND THE ASSISTANCE No facts found 8 3 2 4 7 SERVICE OF THE STEERING BOARD Not a different treatment 1 1 VII. DISCRIMINATION-RELATED 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ISSUES IN ROMANIA REFLECTED Access to employment and profession Access to education Access to housing Access to public facilities Access to public services Personal dignity IN INTERNATIONAL REPORTS Method for VIII. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR processing No No No causality No infringement Situations not Freedom Justified No facts Not a different COMBATING DISCRIMINATION FIELD criterion evidence relation of a right comparable of speech measure found treatment